You mean because they don't want to support a candidate that is more Tea Party than Dem? Or because it could only happen in Tennessee?
Who is "they"? Looks like "they" voted for the more Conservative or libertarian guy but the Dem party leaders don't want to support who their membership voted for. Now is that not stupid on just about every level you can think of? But then, they are Democrats!
You mean because they don't want to support a candidate that is more Tea Party than Dem? Or because it could only happen in Tennessee?
Who is "they"? Looks like "they" voted for the more Conservative or libertarian guy but the Dem party leaders don't want to support who their membership voted for. Now is that not stupid on just about every level you can think of? But then, they are Democrats!
No. It has to do with the fact that so many candidates were running that any old hound dawg or blue dawg could win.
Who is "they"? Looks like "they" voted for the more Conservative or libertarian guy but the Dem party leaders don't want to support who their membership voted for. Now is that not stupid on just about every level you can think of? But then, they are Democrats!
No. It has to do with the fact that so many candidates were running that any old hound dawg or blue dawg could win.
Go ahead and tell us what the problem is with that. Are we all free to run and does the person with the most votes win?
No. It has to do with the fact that so many candidates were running that any old hound dawg or blue dawg could win.
Go ahead and tell us what the problem is with that. Are we all free to run and does the person with the most votes win?
Why do you constantly require explanation when you already know the obvious answer? The point is that the guy got elected becasue the field was so spread. Had it been a narrow field he most likely would have lost. In any case, it's a silly argument. It's a conservative seat and no Dem was going to win it regardless. Which begs the issue, why did you even post the link in the first place, other than to put up another silly argument about how conservatives are "smarter." Not.
Go ahead and tell us what the problem is with that. Are we all free to run and does the person with the most votes win?
Why do you constantly require explanation when you already know the obvious answer? The point is that the guy got elected becasue the field was so spread. Had it been a narrow field he most likely would have lost. In any case, it's a silly argument. It's a conservative seat and no Dem was going to win it regardless. Which begs the issue, why did you even post the link in the first place, other than to put up another silly argument about how conservatives are "smarter." Not.
Not really an answer, but you do seem to point out that this Conservative/Libertarian talking fellow knew how to get the right to run in the fall. No liberal down there was that smart. You are right in that I merely wanted to poke a stick in the eyes of liberals over just how dumb they are in how they think.
Why do you constantly require explanation when you already know the obvious answer? The point is that the guy got elected becasue the field was so spread. Had it been a narrow field he most likely would have lost. In any case, it's a silly argument. It's a conservative seat and no Dem was going to win it regardless. Which begs the issue, why did you even post the link in the first place, other than to put up another silly argument about how conservatives are "smarter." Not.
Not really an answer, but you do seem to point out that this Conservative/Libertarian talking fellow knew how to get the right to run in the fall. No liberal down there was that smart. You are right in that I merely wanted to poke a stick in the eyes of liberals over just how dumb they are in how they think.
Not really an answer, but you do seem to point out that this Conservative/Libertarian talking fellow knew how to get the right to run in the fall. No liberal down there was that smart. You are right in that I merely wanted to poke a stick in the eyes of liberals over just how dumb they are in how they think.
So liberals are dumb? That's your conclusion?
Not a conclusion, just passing on some common knowledge!