How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. Adam Smith
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. Adam Smith
What I want, Bill, is for you to post something authoritative from the Russian Academy of Science that repudiates what they signed in 2009.
This is the official position of the Russian Academy, Bill, when it changes let me know.
Does that mean they are right? Something about cycles seems to escape some of our dimmer contributors. This is a issue about science and not politics. No amount of Algore worship will change that.
This is the official position of the Russian Academy, Bill, when it changes let me know.
Does that mean they are right? Something about cycles seems to escape some of our dimmer contributors. This is a issue about science and not politics. No amount of Algore worship will change that.
Once again you are confused. Your con friend, Bill, posted that the Russian Academy of Science had said that global climate change was a hoax. His proof was an obscure German magazine's translation of a Russian article by unnamed scientists reputedly members of the Academy. I merely pointed out he was wrong.
Got it?
As to the question if "they are right". They are scientists. They think so. This issue is about science, remember? Why do you doubt them? I bet it has something to do with your politics.
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. Adam Smith
Does that mean they are right? Something about cycles seems to escape some of our dimmer contributors. This is a issue about science and not politics. No amount of Algore worship will change that.
Once again you are confused. Your con friend, Bill, posted that the Russian Academy of Science had said that global climate change was a hoax. His proof was an obscure German magazine's translation of a Russian article by unnamed scientists reputedly members of the Academy. I merely pointed out he was wrong.
Got it?
As to the question if "they are right". They are scientists. They think so. This issue is about science, remember? Why do you doubt them? I bet it has something to do with your politics.
We all get your argument. Just because you are wrong and don't seem to understand what Bill was saying is your problem and not ours.
Once again you are confused. Your con friend, Bill, posted that the Russian Academy of Science had said that global climate change was a hoax. His proof was an obscure German magazine's translation of a Russian article by unnamed scientists reputedly members of the Academy. I merely pointed out he was wrong.
Got it?
As to the question if "they are right". They are scientists. They think so. This issue is about science, remember? Why do you doubt them? I bet it has something to do with your politics.
We all get your argument. Just because you are wrong and don't seem to understand what Bill was saying is your problem and not ours.
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. Adam Smith
This is the official position of the Russian Academy, Bill, when it changes let me know.
Does that mean they are right? Something about cycles seems to escape some of our dimmer contributors. This is a issue about science and not politics. No amount of Algore worship will change that.
Pooh, if the best argument you can offer is Al Gore, you have no dog in this fight. Sorry, buckwheat, but you are way over your head. LWSP.
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. Adam Smith
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. Adam Smith
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. Adam Smith
Re: Got ice? « Reply #114 on Jun 14, 2012, 8:49pm »
This entire argument is ridiculous because Bill and the other deniers in this thread have no scientific education, no field work and are basically idiots.
This is the problem with the net - fools like Bill believe that they've engaged in "research" because they're retired, sitting on their fat asses and spending their time finding websites agreeing with the sorry ass opinions they've developed in their isolation.
And, of course, trolls like Pooh and Dave come along to support them just because they love to troll and Bill falls for it because he's as dumb as a farking stump.
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. Adam Smith
This entire argument is ridiculous because Bill and the other deniers in this thread have no scientific education, no field work and are basically idiots.
This is the problem with the net - fools like Bill believe that they've engaged in "research" because they're retired, sitting on their fat asses and spending their time finding websites agreeing with the sorry ass opinions they've developed in their isolation.
And, of course, trolls like Pooh and Dave come along to support them just because they love to troll and Bill falls for it because he's as dumb as a farking stump.
=Bob
So according to you, no one can discuss (or know) anything they haven't "done field work" in. You come up with the strangest posts.
Bob, Anytime you want to play a game of chess for a $1,000 donation to the Aztecs for the loser, I am ready. You should win easily since I am, "as dumb as a farking stump".