AztecMesa - Big Sky Considering Taking on All WAC Teams

« Big Sky Considering Taking on All WAC Teams »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 25, 2013, 11:49am

........ Aztec Mesa - Your Home for Aztec Talk!

AztecMesa :: San Diego State Aztecs :: Aztec Sports and Conference Discussions :: Big Sky Considering Taking on All WAC Teams

« Page 2 of 2 Jump to page Go

Author

Topic: Big Sky Considering Taking on All WAC Teams (Read 1,660 times)

titanczar
Starter

member is offline

Joined: Dec 2011
Gender: Male

Posts: 231

Re: Big Sky Considering Taking on All WAC Teams
« Reply #20 on Jul 20, 2012, 1:27am »

Jul 19, 2012, 6:31pm, sleepinggiantsfan wrote:

Jul 19, 2012, 6:17pm, jdgaucho wrote:

so would this mean Utah Valley and Bakersfield are still homeless?

Considering that UVU has been subsidizing its athletics teams to the tune of some ridiculous amount like 88%, for them to have even discussed joining the WAC was absolutely absurd. If anything, that school should be considering DROPPING DOWN a notch.

I still don't get you guys in the NSBW refusing to admit Bakersfield. That school is located in a county with like half a million people who would love to support the university. After all, Bakersfield College has had a high quality hoops program for years. And its an easy road trip for everybody. Frankly, I wonder whether schools like CSUN and UCR aren't afraid the hicks from Buck Owensville might not embarrass them.

You're either stupid or still sleeping; UH > Bake. SDSU > Bake. Boise > Bake.

When whores like SDSU leave when Jon offers you the right deal, the BW doesn't want to be stuck with Bake.

If Boise doesn't get in, the BW can live with 9 teams.

Bake coming into the BW would mean they would be the smallest school, even smaller than private school UOP. Yeah, I know UOP leaves after this year. The 2nd smallest BW school after UOP, would still be about double the enrollment at Bake. While there is potential for growth at Bake, it's not happening with budget cuts and enrollment freezes and fee increases through the CSU system. So even if the student passed a fee referendum, it wouldn't raise as much money for athletics as the BW CSU's with their 25K or more enrollments.

« Last Edit: Jul 20, 2012, 1:29am by titanczar »

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Hey Sipe; Red Right 88! Great Call!

monty
Coordinator

member is offline

Joined: Sept 2011
Gender: Male

Posts: 7,721

Re: Big Sky Considering Taking on All WAC Teams
« Reply #21 on Jul 20, 2012, 1:35am »

Wow, calling them 'Bake' is absurdly annoying. p.s. why are so many california truck stops b words? blythe, banning, 'Bake,' Barstow

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

votecarcetti
Coordinator

member is offline

[avatar]

It's a new day on the Mesa.

Joined: Dec 2010
Gender: Male

Posts: 1,047

Re: Big Sky Considering Taking on All WAC Teams
« Reply #22 on Jul 20, 2012, 9:02am »

Jul 20, 2012, 1:35am, monty wrote:

Wow, calling them 'Bake' is absurdly annoying. p.s. why are so many california truck stops b words? blythe, banning, 'Bake,' Barstow

You forgot Baker and Buttonwillow.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

gauchofreg
New Recruit

member is offline

Joined: Nov 2011
Gender: Male

Posts: 49

Re: Big Sky Considering Taking on All WAC Teams
« Reply #23 on Jul 20, 2012, 12:30pm »

Jul 20, 2012, 1:35am, monty wrote:

Wow, calling them 'Bake' is absurdly annoying. p.s. why are so many california truck stops b words? blythe, banning, 'Bake,' Barstow

I don't know, maybe you should ask Bubba?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

« Page 2 of 2 Jump to page Go

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free