AztecMesa
« Roster Depth »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 19, 2013, 1:09pm



........ Aztec Mesa - Your Home for Aztec Talk!

AztecMesa :: San Diego State Aztecs :: Aztec Sports and Conference Discussions :: Roster Depth
Page 1 of 2 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: Roster Depth (Read 1,529 times)
k5james
Guest
 Roster Depth
« Thread Started on Jun 18, 2012, 1:30pm »

Heres a quick table showing the change in our roster depth since the Craft/long days...

Year**************NR
200601194539
200701215045
200800195229
200900185555
201001254930
201100314536
201200314444


Since we don't have a preseason roster for 12 yet I just removed the known greyshirts from the '12 class and added them in. These numbers don't take into account transfers.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
FULL_MONTY
Coordinator
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/sc hools/sdsu/sports/w-xc/auto_bsi main/6798712.jpeg



Joined: May 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,892
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #1 on Jun 18, 2012, 1:45pm »

Can you do this with only the scholly players?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]


Jan 1, 2013, 3:57pm, monty wrote:
I've been a fan since the Gonzaga game, I deserve to sit on Eliot Hirshman's lap.
k5james
Guest
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #2 on Jun 18, 2012, 2:00pm »


Jun 18, 2012, 1:45pm, FULL_MONTY wrote:
Can you do this with only the scholly players?


It's really hard to identify who's a scholly player, especially going back more than a few years.

It's pretty safe to assume anyone with a rating is a scholly player though.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
sdsuaztecs
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,658
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #3 on Jun 18, 2012, 2:25pm »

Interesting analysis. Going from 20 to 30 ***-players is an improvement but really how much? I like how Rocky is going about recruiting because he seems to have a knack for identifying "real" football players or players that have a natural instinct about the game. Nine wins this year gets us 35 + three-star guys and 10 + wins gets us 40+ three-star guys.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
monty
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Sept 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,721
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #4 on Jun 18, 2012, 2:52pm »

the only question is: are they giving out the same, more or less 3 stars, which is to say: is there 3 star inflation?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
k5james
Guest
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #5 on Jun 18, 2012, 3:02pm »


Jun 18, 2012, 2:52pm, monty wrote:
the only question is: are they giving out the same, more or less 3 stars, which is to say: is there 3 star inflation?Q


I'm not sure. That would be something to ask Agustin.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
sleepinggiantsfan
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,762
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #6 on Jun 18, 2012, 5:01pm »

There's grade inflation in general.

Back in 2004 when Rivals first began to assign number grades rather than just stars, some kids were rated as low as 4.9. Now the lowest rating is 5.2. I don't think that means a 5.2 is now equivalent to a 4.9 back then. Instead it appears as though anybody not thought highly enough to receive a 5.2 grade is simply "unrated" by Rivals. In other words, I think a 5.2 now is about equal to a 5.0 back then. The conclusion I draw - and I'm talking just generally - is that anybody receiving a grade of 5.5 now is a 3-star kid whereas he would have received a 5.3 rating back then and been a 2-star recruit.

The above having been said, I don't think there are any more 5-star players than there ever were and probably not all that many more 4-star recruits so there are considerably more 3-star players than there used to be and with less kids rated "NR," more 2-star recruits as well.

I should add that I think the JYP/SteveEM system is at least as valuable. That is, did any schools from AQ conferences offer a kid and, if so, which ones? Look at Jeff Overbaugh. He's given a downright bad 5.2 rating by Rivals, but he was offered by Tennessee. Why did Rivals rate him so low? Because he's a long snapper and just like kickers and punters, Rivals and every other service always gives special teams players improper low scores. So much so that I think those of us who care about this stuff should probably give every ST recruit an additional .3 points on their score in order to gauge their actual value. So I'd do the same with Lloyd Mills and Seamus McMorrow.
« Last Edit: Jun 18, 2012, 5:07pm by sleepinggiantsfan »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

AztecWilliam
Coordinator
*****
member is offline



"America loves a winner and will not tolerate a loser" - George Patton



Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,180
Location: Fallbrook, CA
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #7 on Jun 18, 2012, 8:49pm »

One thing confuses me about the chart in this thread. If I interpret it correctly, the Aztecs have had more than the total number of players allowed on a team several of the years listed. Not scholarship players (which is 85 at present), but total players. I checked and it appears that 105 players is the maximum, which would include scholarship players as well as walk-ons.

AzWm
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

AztecWilliam
sdsuaztecs
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,658
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #8 on Jun 18, 2012, 10:34pm »

AZWM,

That chart by Zuma took a lot of effort. Kudos to Zuma. I'm not about to challenge the info but it certainly is close to Obama's claim that he has authority to determine whoever is legal in the USA. As I understand it, you are scheduled for deportment to Nicaragua no later than July 5, 2013.
« Last Edit: Jun 19, 2012, 12:33am by sdsuaztecs »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
AztecWilliam
Coordinator
*****
member is offline



"America loves a winner and will not tolerate a loser" - George Patton



Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,180
Location: Fallbrook, CA
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #9 on Jun 19, 2012, 1:00am »


Jun 18, 2012, 10:34pm, sdsuaztecs wrote:
AZWM,

That chart by Zuma took a lot of effort. Kudos to Zuma. I'm not about to challenge the info but it certainly is close to Obama's claim that he has authority to determine whoever is legal in the USA. As I understand it, you are scheduled for deportment to Nicaragua no later than July 5, 2013.


Actually, it's deportation, but who cares? Anyway, I've always wanted to visit Nicaragua. (Okay, that's a lie. It's Chile that I've always wanted to visit. . . seriously).

But is it possible that you interpreted my question as a criticism? That would be an incorrect interpretation. It was just a question.

AzWm
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

AztecWilliam
ervaztec
Assistant Coach
****
member is offline





Joined: May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 387
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #10 on Jun 19, 2012, 9:05am »

No mater what you think of the * system this is nothing but good news. Not only do we have an increase in *** players but we have a Full roster. Also, I don't think this counts the 2 Pac 12 transfers.

God, I remember when ALL news from the Mesa was bad news.

Thanks Zuma.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
monty
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Sept 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,721
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #11 on Jun 19, 2012, 11:04am »

Yup, Zuma broke the old curse; let us hope we haven't started a new one by getting rid of the big Z.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
uncledougy
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,975
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #12 on Jun 19, 2012, 11:23am »

Does anyone know who the 4-star was in 2010?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
coolethan
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,487
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #13 on Jun 19, 2012, 11:39am »


Jun 19, 2012, 11:23am, uncledougy wrote:
Does anyone know who the 4-star was in 2010?

Perry Jackson. 8-) :)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
sleepinggiantsfan
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,762
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #14 on Jun 19, 2012, 11:45am »


Jun 19, 2012, 9:05am, ervaztec wrote:
No mater what you think of the * system this is nothing but good news. Not only do we have an increase in *** players but we have a Full roster. Also, I don't think this counts the 2 Pac 12 transfers.

A few weeks ago, I broke down our recruits for each class since 2006 according to the scholarship offers they received from schools in AQ conferences. It was as low as four in 2008, which was a half-Chuck, half-Hoke class, but almost always five or six. That was until 2011, when we had seven, and this year, when we had 13 such recruits. IMO anyway, that proves we're bumping up recruiting. With our impending move to the BE, I'm hoping for an even better class in 2013.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

k5james
Guest
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #15 on Jun 19, 2012, 1:00pm »

The '08 class was all Chuckles. The '09 class was half and half.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
sleepinggiantsfan
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,762
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #16 on Jun 19, 2012, 1:34pm »


Jun 19, 2012, 1:00pm, k5james wrote:
The '08 class was all Chuckles. The '09 class was half and half.

Oops. Major mea culpa to Brady for placing any blame on him for that train wreck.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

goodygood
New Recruit
*
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 29
Location: Near Petco Park Baby
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #17 on Jun 19, 2012, 4:49pm »

Sorry. I don't follow as close as you guys. What is the chart showing?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Get it
sleepinggiantsfan
Coordinator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,762
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #18 on Jun 19, 2012, 5:39pm »


Jun 19, 2012, 4:49pm, goodygood wrote:
Sorry. I don't follow as close as you guys. What is the chart showing?

Evolution of the roster from Chuck Long's first season according to the number of stars the Rivals recruiting network gave to our recruits.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

k5james
Guest
 Re: Roster Depth
« Reply #19 on Jun 19, 2012, 7:12pm »


Jun 18, 2012, 8:49pm, AztecWilliam wrote:
One thing confuses me about the chart in this thread. If I interpret it correctly, the Aztecs have had more than the total number of players allowed on a team several of the years listed. Not scholarship players (which is 85 at present), but total players. I checked and it appears that 105 players is the maximum, which would include scholarship players as well as walk-ons.

AzWm


That's what the official August roster for each year had listed.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Page 1 of 2 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile